Early RTX 2050 and MX550 Benchmarks Reveal Weak-Sauce Performance

An unidentified leaker has posted 3DMark TimeSpy success for Nvidia’s new entry-level RTX 2050 and MX 550 GPUs to the Chinese forum Zhihu. The early benchmarks expose that both of those GPUs are a significant downgrade when compared to Nvidia’s newest spending plan-helpful GPU, the RTX 3050. That is to be expected, supplied the 64-bit memory interface.

A few days in the past, Nvidia formally announced 3 new mobile GPUs for the laptop computer market place — the RTX 2050, MX570, and MX 550. The new 500-sequence in the MX lineup is considered to be a comprehensive upgrade and replacement of the more mature 400-sequence, while the RTX 2050 seems to be a new way Nvidia can give DLSS and ray tracing aid to an even additional budget-pleasant audience than the RTX 3050.

Specs for the RTX 2050 include 2,048 CUDA cores and 4GB of GDDR6 working on a quite little 64-bit bus with just 112GB/s of memory bandwidth. Maximum electric power usage is rated for a GSP of 45W with a maximum boost clock of 1477MHz. Nvidia under no circumstances gave its budget Turing GPUs (i.e., TU116 and TU117) RT cores and Tensor cores, and the RTX 20-sequence GPUs had been really substantial. In buy to build the new RTX 2050, Nvidia will be tapping the Ampere GA107 main instead of a disabled TU106 die.

In accordance to the put up, the RTX 2050 and MX570 are essentially the exact same chip. It’s not distinct if the MX570 will have the precise same specs as the RTX 2050, which includes its 2048 CUDA core count and GA107 die, or if some things will be turned off. Just one crucial distinction is that the MX570 only arrives with 2GB of GDDR6 memory, which is about as the 4GB on the RTX 2050 was by now a problem. Potentially the RT cores and/or tensor cores will also be disabled. We’ll obtain out more the moment notebooks with the new GPUs arrive.

MX550 and MX570 in the meantime are completely different animals. For starters, the MX550 evidently sporting activities 1024 CUDA cores and is based on Nvidia’s Turing TU116 GPU as an alternative of the Ampere GA107. The MX550 will also assist each 2GB and 4GB memory capacities featuring GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus — the exact as the 2050 and MX570. Whilst that could surface to be half the core depend of the GA107, keep in intellect that Turing featured individual floating point and integer pipelines, when on Ampere there is certainly a committed FP pipeline and a shared FP/INT pipeline. Ampere is quicker, extra effective, and lesser, but the MX550 may perhaps only be a modest phase down in authentic-entire world gaming functionality.

3DMark TimeSpy Outcomes

Backing up the over info, the MX550 scored 7,888 factors in the Time Spy CPU check and 2,510 factors in the graphics examination. The RTX 2050 outcome options a CPU score of 7,779 details and a graphics rating of 3,369 factors. We do not know something about the notebooks that housed the RTX 2050 and MX 550. Continue to, these benefits are quite minimal and are similar to Nvidia’s entry-stage solutions from a year ago.

For comparison, Nvidia’s previous entry-amount GTX 1650 cell GPU scores 3,634 factors in the Time Spy graphics benchmark. That tends to make it marginally more quickly than the new RTX 2050 — at least in Time Spy. It is also significantly slower than the new RTX 3050 cell that scores 4,869 details in the very same examination.

If these benefits are any sign of authentic-planet gaming performance, then the new GTX 2050 can be compared to a GTX 1650 with RT cores and DLSS help enabled on the GPU. The MX570 may complete at the same level, though with 50 percent the VRAM we wouldn’t assume it to be pretty as fast in some more recent video games.

Thinking of ray tracing requires a first rate quantity of GPU horsepower to play at respectable frame rates and decent memory bandwidth — even with DLSS enabled. We’ve currently noticed the RTX 3050 struggle with RT effects because of to its extremely modest 4GB body buffer, so the RTX 2050 with its narrower and slower 64-bit memory bus will inevitably conduct even worse.

We’re not positive if there is certainly a true desire for these very low-stop GPUs. Most likely they are a lot more about giving a aspect checkbox than precise usable RT/DLSS capabilities, even though we’ll withhold closing judgements right until laptops with the GPUs truly start shipping and delivery and we can exam them ourselves. They’ll also have to contend against Intel’s future Arc Alchemist GPUs, which possibly is the genuine explanation for their existence.